Tuesday, July 28, 2009

House Will Miss Deadline For National Healthcare; Obama Dwelling In Land of Butthurt

As more Blue Dog Democrats voice their concerns over how quickly this bill is being pushed without so much as a glance-over (sound familiar?), Obama continues to criticize Republican opposition even though it's these very said liberals who are causing the delay of the bill.

“It is not imperative we do this now,” Boyd told reporters. “It’s more important to get it right,” he said. “Let’s keep talking.” says Democrat Allen Boyd.

Obama has clearly been upset these past couple days; I can't figure out whether it's due to the delaying of this bill or the fact that people didn't grovel at his feet for making a non-apology to Seargent James Crowley.

This bill is yet another reminder of the arm-twisting and "push it through before anyone realizes what the hell is going on" politics that will surely become infamous thanks to the current administration. Hypocritically, 5 years ago, Obama duely criticized George W. Bush for this very thing.

...When you rush these budgets that are a foot high and nobody has any idea what's in them and nobody has read them. ...And it gets rushed through without any clear deliberation or debate then these kinds of things happen. And I think that this is in some ways what happened to the Patriot Act. I mean you remember that there was no real debate about that. It was so quick after 9/11 that it was introduced that people felt very intimidated by the administration.- Barack Obama in an interview with Randi Rhodes, 2004

Politicians are all the same, folks. I hope some of the more level-headed Democrats and even some of you more moderate conservatives that voted for this man soon come to realize what you've done. I've noticed that some of you delusional idiots are still blaming things that Obama did on Bush; a true testament to how mentally ill many of you are.

Pull your heads out of your asses; you didn't elect the Messiah. You've elected a vehement racist; a paper-pushing Marxist that's never even run a confections stand at a county fair.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Moar Race Card, Plz

"I don't even know the full story, but I'm going to go ahead and pull the race card anyway." - Some guy named Barack Obama

A couple nights ago, a concerned neighbor in a Cambridge community called the police on two men that appeared to be breaking into a nearby house. Apparently, these two men were the home-owner, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., and his driver attempting to access the house after Gates came home from an overseas trip.

Unaware of what exactly was going on, one of the officers asked Gates, who was standing in the foyer of the home, to speak with him. Gates vehemently refused and immediately pulled the race card, citing the only reason he wanted to speak with him was because he was a "black man in America". Gates then phoned an unidentified person claiming that he was dealing with a racist police officer - LOL. This professor then told the officer that he "didn't know who he was messing with" and that "this wasn't the last of it". Lastly, the esteemed Harvard professor, an high-class role model for young blacks, then told the police officer that he would "speak with his momma outside", after the officer asked Gates to step outdoors.

Racebait, black man, yo momma, lawsuit, yada yada yada, you get the picture. Yet another grim reminder of the type of attitude from citizens that make people like Seargent Crowley hate their jobs and are virtually deballed thanks to racemongers like Al Sharpton and organizations like the ACLU and SPLC.

But wait! Some dude that's pretending to lead our country has decided to take time from his busy day of apologizing to our enemies to address this most important issue. Obama, butthurt over a spending bill being turned down, had this to say:

"What I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately," Obama said. "That's just a fact."
ORLY? It just so happens, Mr. Affirmative Action, that blacks and Hispanics commit a disproportionate amount of crime; therefore are pulled over more often. "That's just a fact", asshole. It's "just a fact" that almost 60% of homicides committed in this country are committed by black men aged 18-25. It's "just a fact" that number represents less than 5% of the total population. It's "just a fact" that over 20% of the country's prison system is comprised of illegal aliens; namely Hispanics. That's not legal ones! Those are the ILLEGAL ones! Of course, you'd never hear that statistic, because in that case Hispanics are lumped in with whites whenever it benefits the system.

It also happens to be "just a fact" that you immediately stopped what you were doing to address this, in the grand scheme of things, unimportant issue. Why, Mr. President, did it take Hillary continuously jabbing you in the ribs and several days for you to say anything about the fight for democracy in Iran?

Why, Mr. President, did you scarcely mention the brave young soldiers who died for their country the week that Michael Jackson died, if you mentioned them at all? Instead, you chose to abandon your civic duties and laud a perverted, pedarest freak who sold a few records. Why, Mr. Preten...err...President?

Without knowing the full story, you'll stop in your tracks to defend an instigating professor pulling the race card, but you will not address the well over 100 white women who are raped per day by black men; largely for racial reasons, when the reverse (white men raping black women) occurs less than ten times a year. Why, Mr. President?

Due to Mr. Gates and Obama's racially divisive words, charges were dropped against the incredibly gentlemanly Harvard professor. Not only is this a grave form of injustice for the officer in and of itself, but it will make it seem as though the officers were wrong and open up the flood gates for a lawsuit.

OK, my little rant is over, here are the police records for your viewing pleasure. Please click on the pictures themselves to view the whole thing.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Michael Savage Unbanned From Britain!

This is fantastic news for democracy and free speech everywhere.

As of July 18, 2009, Dr. Michael Savage is unbanned from Britain thanks to incoming Home Secretary Alan Johnson. Johnson cited the entire escapade as a "terrible blunder" and completely scrapped the list of personas-non-grata composed by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

What I find amazing is that such a "non influential" person as Dr. Savage virtually forced Smith from her position. In the events of her misuse of taxpayer money and the outrageous ban of a man who has never done anything to warrant it, Jacqui Smith stepped down last month.

"I am stunned by this sudden sign of sanity in the U.K. government," Savage told World Net Daily. "But I won't believe it until they send a letter to me confirming it."

Whatever you may think of conservative radio show host Michael Savage, his ban was outright fascistic and based on false pretense. I'm very pleased to see the ban lifted from one of my favorite people in the media.

Monday, July 13, 2009

May Posterity Forget You Were Our Countrymen

I found this gem written by Lance Fairchok over at AmericanThinker, a website you should familiarize yourself with if you haven't done so already.

The article basically covers the current political atmosphere of both parties, particularly the "Republicans", or those who dare call themselves such.

Long read, but most certainly worth it.

There is something about D.C. that saps the will and dulls the intellect of conservatives. Prolonged exposure makes them fretful and risk-averse, even timid with controversial issues. Rather than standing on the fundamental values that define American conservativism such as fiscal restraint, limited government, low taxes and free markets, they sidestep and tap-dance, befuddled by the "bi-partisan" opiates peddled by Socialist Democrats.

Perhaps they are worried about re-election more than the core issues. Their long record of misreading the national temperament, rolling over on leftist initiatives, and pushing the wrong candidates has alienated conservatives of all stripes. They squandered the mandate voters handed them in 2004. Vast numbers have now registered Independent in protest. When you don't fight back, you lose. Socialist calls for "bipartisanship" are a trick conservatives fall for again and again, a tool they use to undermine us; they do not pretend to follow it. So why do we listen to political traitors like Colin Powell or fence-sitting bureaucrats like Tom Ridge? Why do we give the advice of "big tent" moderates any credence? Because our opponents tell us to, and, like fools, we listen.


Let me say what most Republicans feel. When Colin Powell came out in support of Barack Obama, he effectively renounced Republicanism. Powell spat in the face of all conservative Americans and all his dissembling on Sunday gab fests does not change that fact. Obama is unmistakably and unabashedly socialist in his policies; he is the embodiment of the radical left and his policies are a disaster for our nation. Powell knows there will be no forgiveness. So when he criticizes "right wing" conservatives such as Rush Limbaugh, he is merely appeasing his new masters and weakening the party he has already betrayed.

It's not just Limbaugh. When any conservative figure is perceived as pivotal to the success of the Republican Party, the Socialists go gunning for them, they use every stratagem and deceit they can, they concoct and exaggerate, they ridicule and they lie. Sarah Palin, Ted Stevens, Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, Tom Delay, Dick Cheney and Rush Limbaugh are all examples. The smears, slander and character assassination are a tactic they are not shy about using. The press is their ally, repeating every absurd and fallacious talking point, stacking panels with Socialist apologists and shouting down conservative perspectives. Inevitably, they find a Republican quisling, like Powell, to parrot their words, to reinforce them in the minds of the voter, giving them validity, and undermining the values they pretend they support.


Either you believe in your principles or you do not. If not, you might as well go the way of the wretched Arlen Specter. You fight honorably, but you fight to win, because the alternative is a failed America. There is not much time, 2010 is our last chance. Once the trillions in stimulus fill the Democrat party coffers and cement their cronies into government, the nation is theirs, and just like the title on James Carville's newest book proclaims, ‘40 More Years, How The Democrats will Rule the Next Generation,' we will be powerless to stop the destruction of our institutions.

Yes, Carville used the word Rule. Not serve the nation, not govern, not lead, but rule. The word speaks volumes to the underlying belief system and motivations of the Socialist Democrats. This is not paranoia or conspiracy nuttiness, this is real. They fully intend to manipulate, steal, propagandize and deconstruct everything we cherish, everything we hold dear as Americans. If they succeed, the country will be unrecognizable in a few years time. Even the soviet era newspaper holdover PRAVDA is warning of the catastrophe of American Marxism on its pages (and hell is likely freezing over).


Here is a clear simple message from the heartland to the sorry excuses for conservatives that run the Republican Party: We do not want leftist-lites. We want principled and outspoken leaders that do not give a damn about the good opinion of the corrupt press or foreign princes or the approval of the "other side of the isle." We want you to go for the jugular, we want you to expose the corruption, uncover the deceit, shout out your condemnation and outrage and hit them again and again and again. We want you to get mad at the trillions in theft and act mad. Do not pull your punches and do not back down from the fight. We want you act like Patriots and save this country, because the consequences, despite our wealth and despite our power, are the same as they were at our founding.


Read more at http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/may_posterity_forget_you_were.html

Saturday, July 11, 2009

All Our Problems Are Solved! Obama Takes On Africa

Unemployment is at it's highest point in years, folks are losing their livelihoods daily. National industries are being socialized left and right. People are being kicked from their homes. The Federal government as well as state governments are virtually bankrupt. We have a "leader" that panders to our enemies and spits on our allies. We have a uberliberal supermajority that's shoving one of the biggest lies in our history, man-made global warming, down our throats and soon enough will be hitting our pockets. These troglodytes are considering a SECOND stimulus. We have an economy that keeps getting worse by the day. So what does Dear Leader do?

Sends money to Africa.

No, really.

Yet again following in the footsteps of his infamous predecessor, Barack Hussein Obama has decided that since our money is going to be virtually worthless in the next few years, he may as well throw away a few more million. George W. Bush has squandered spent more money on Africa than any other sitting president, and I'm sure that Obama won't miss this opportunity to throw even more capital into this money pit. Make no mistake; the money only goes to line the pockets of endlessly corrupt African leaders is well-spent and goes towards a dictatorial worthy cause, so this is a sure sign that Obama is full of shit has solved all the economic problems in this country already so he's already supporting others financially.

Obama has stated that African nations need to stop focusing on one particular commodity, such as AIDS , AK-47s , voodoo oil or cocoa, and also added that African leaders can't just enrich themselves with "stimulus" money and let their own people starve and die like they always do. "No business wants to invest in a place where the government skims 20 percent off the top, or the head of the Port Authority is corrupt," he said. "No person wants to live in a society where the rule of law gives way to the rule of brutality and bribery. That is not democracy, that is tyranny, even if occasionally you sprinkle an election in there", Dear Leader stated.

You know what? I'm an open-minded kind of guy. I'm sure that this money will be used to build their economy and turn a continent which most resembles 20,000 B.C. into a first-world country in no time. Obama will cure AIDS, teach Africans not to smoke HIV medication, stop rampant rape-as-a-career, cure African hunger even though they eat the seeds we send them to plant their own crops, and African leaders will soon become respectable human beings that care about their people rather than their own fat bank accounts.

Yes, this will result in epic failure work out beautifully.

Communist Goals of 1963 - How Many Have Been Reached Or Surpassed?

Firstly, I must state that I can not vouch for this document's authenticity. However, what's more important is that the great majority of these goals have been reached, if not surpassed. It's a good read nonetheless.

Let me set the record straight; what you're witnessing in "your" (as if) government is not liberalism. The more liberal forefathers are currently rolling over in their graves, and many modern day liberals do not support the direction this country is headed. We're witnessing a bit of socialism, Communism and Marxism all at once.

Take a read and consider which of these has already happened. You may find yourself somewhat startled.

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35

January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals



Thursday, January 10, 1963

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]


1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Welcome To...Russia?

czar (zär, tsär)n.
1. also tsar or tzar (zär, tsär) A male monarch or emperor, especially one of the emperors who ruled Russia until the revolution of 1917.
2. A person having great power; an autocrat
3. Informal An appointed official having special powers to regulate or supervise an activity

New definition - 37 members of Chairman Maobama's administration.

One can only wonder what will become of the administration or what it's intent is once it begins to resemble your standard Communist regime.

Health & Human Resources Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has just announced a new czar, this one will oversee the FDA. According to Sebelius the czar will, "be responsible for restructuring and revitalizing the FDA's work to protect our food supply". Considering what the FDA's "standards" have been in the past, the last statement scares the living crap out of me.

Not only is the appointment of all these czars questionable, the biggest concern is what these people will actually do. According to the administration, the czars will be Special Masters of Compensation in order to regulate companies receiving bailout funds and ensure they're being used appropriately. I can see this applying to the auto industry and banks that were bailed out, but what about the others? What about Energy Czar Carol Browner, who has rather strong and well documented socialist ties? Urban czar? Health reform czar? This ain't all. Yesterday, a Congressman said there are now a total of 37 czars.

Now, you may ask, who exactly is "in control" of these czars? No one. Well, no one except for Lord Obama himself. Considering how well he's been handling things so far, the mere thought that this man is in control of anything else makes me piss myself. Let's get this straight; these czars have no congressional oversight whatsoever. They, in reality, can do virtually whatever they want. They have no boss. NO ONE tells them what to do, they're simply another bureaucratic layer in an administration that's attempting one of the biggest powergrabs in American history.

Speaking of Energy Czar Carol Browner, she has come under fire recently for no less than appalling comments aimed at auto industry executives. "Put nothing in writing", says the recycled Clintonista head of the EPA. Not only is this statement controversial and only a teeny bit outrageous, it may very well be advocating illegal acts. Representative Sensenbrenner, a Republican from Wisconsin, is calling for a congressional investigation concerning these comments. Reason being; federal law requires executives and any other officials to physically document any major policy decisions within the industry. Then again, his request may very well go unnoticed. She's a czar, remember?

I love transparency.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

President Barack Obama: A Fraud You Can Believe In!

I can not take credit for this article, just passing it along. This great piece was written by Herb Denenberg of The Bulletin.

Feel free to pass it around, and feel free to comment!

The hopes and prayers of the American people have finally been answered with the election of a new president: A fraud they can believe in.

Yes, and even as Barack Obama demonstrates he is a fraud, phony and hypocrite par excellence — who also happens to be in way over his head — the American people still believe in him. Yes, love is grand and his approval rating is still miraculously high. If the truth were known, that approval rating would be sinking lower than the stock market, home prices or the economy.

I doubted he was the Messiah, but now I’m not sure. When a president can be the greatest wealth destroyer in history and still maintain high approval ratings, maybe he does have supernatural powers. What’s more he is god-like. It is said God so loved the poor that he made many of them; Mr. Obama is almost outdoing God by turning so many into poor people.


There was abundant evidence Mr. Obama was a fraud, not a savior, in everything he’s done in life — from his early education to his days in the Illinois legislature then to his U.S. Senate days and finally as a successful candidate for president. If anyone would look at his record and associates they’d see he’s advocated infanticide in the Illinois State Senate, he’s never displayed a glimmer of bipartisanship and he came out of the slime and sewer that is Chicago machine politics. And his associates would prevent him from getting security clearance if he was applying for a government job, rather than being elected to one.

This column has documented Mr. Obama’s fraudulent positioning on the most important issues of our time. He talks of bipartisanship, but is totally partisan. He is against earmarks, but is about to sign a bill with more than 8,000 of them. He says he’s going over every spending bill line by line to eliminate waste and abuse. But then he passes the greatest spending and stimulus bill in history without even allowing time enough for Congress and the public to read it. He says he is going to keep lobbyists out of his administration, but then he packs almost as many lobbyists into his administration as tax cheats.


It turns a sideshow into the main ring. This idiocy of the Obama administration was best captured by a cartoon a recent Weekly Standard. It shows the White House with a series of cartoon balloons asking and then answering the following questions:

“We must take care of the biggest threat to America.”

Question: “The economy?”

Answer: “No.”

Question: ”The banking crisis?”

Answer: “No.”

Question: “Terrorism?”

Answer: “No.”

Question: “Iranian nukes?”

Answer: “No.”

Question: “Then what?”

Answer: “Rush Limbaugh.”

The new politics of Mr. Obama is even pettier, lower and dirtier than the old politics. The only change Mr. Obama is ready to deliver is change for the worse, not the better.


I went through a primary campaign for the U.S. Senate, and by the time I was done I could deliver a campaign speech in my sleep, without notes and without a teleprompter. And I’m sure anyone who has been through a campaign will tell you the same thing. Mr. Obama is a strange exception.

There are even reports that the teleprompter is used to feed him facts and talking points to help him answer questions. There’s also a report the White House is working on a computer unit on the podium to feed him material during press conferences and other question-and-answer formats.

I’m afraid like the great Oz, the great Mr. Obama will soon be discovered to be the fraud that he is. The golden tongue orator can’t move his golden tongue without the aid of a script and a teleprompter.

There have been many false Messiahs in history, but isn’t this going a little too far? We’ve got to set a higher standard, even for false Messiahs.

You may find the rest of this great story here - http://www.thebulletin.us/articles/2009/03/13/herb_denenberg/doc49b840333ee87374341303.txt

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

While The Media Continues Lauding Jackson, Great Men Are Dying - Did YOU Hear About It?

I'm sick of it. I've had enough of the media continuing the wall-t0-wall coverage of some has-been, sicko entertainer. I don't care what you think - to me it's clear that this sacred cow of music was a perverted freak and possible kiddy fiddler that doesn't deserve 1/50 of the media coverage he's been getting. Michael Jackson is dead. Boo hoo. Moving on.

I personally don't care about your little "blah blah good musician" or "blah blah sold a bunch of records" BS. Don't bother writing me, it's not going to do any good. You can sit there all you want and say that he wasn't convicted, so he didn't do anything. True - in America, you're supposedly innocent until proven guilty, but I still have very strong feelings that this sicko was up to something. Even his own sister said it. He had atleast one little boy around him almost all the time, sometimes taking them into back rooms alone and not coming out for hours. Yep. Normal.

Jacko also wrote a short story about a serial killer and child abuser that starred his "very own" children - http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/382002/Michael-Jacksons-nightmare-play-about-child-abuser-and-serial-killer.html Yea, you didn't hear about that, did ya? Of course, in typical liberal fashion, the article blamed his eccentric and downright freakish and disturbing behavior on pain meds instead of on the actions of the actual person.

Enough about the freak; while you're hearing how wonderful of a person he was and how the idiots that used to make fun of him are now coming out to cry for him, great men are sacrificing their lives in the name of their country. Did I hear about it? Did you hear about it? No, I had to actually dig for these stories because the lamestream media won't dare touch the story of patriots when they can kiss the butts of pedophiles instead.

The two brave young men pictured above are Canadian soldiers who died Monday in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan. Pictured on the left is Master Cpl. Pat Audet, 38, along with Cpl. Martin Joanette, who was only 25 years old.

This is Army 1st Lt. Brian Bradshaw who died June 25th; same day as Michael Jackson. Where did you hear about him? It certainly wasn't from the media. Bradshaw died when an explosive detonated near his vehicle. Brian was 24 years old.

Pvt. Aaron Fairbairn (pictured) and Pvt. Justin Casillas were killed by suicide bombers. Justin Casillas was only 19 and graduated highschool last year.

Insurgents in southern Afghanistan also killed three British soldiers.

Folks, there's something very seriously wrong when a possible pedophile who sold a few records is martyrized and brave men who died for our country are completely ignored. According to a blogger who made a few math notes, these young men received approximately 1/20 of the media coverage that Jackson did. This shouldn't surprise anyone, though. The press is well known for lauding degeneracy while condemning patriotism.

Simply another nail in the coffin for what we used to know as nationalism. Of course you know, for this blog entry I am most likely considered a racist or simply hateful. I gave up caring what people thought about me a long time ago. There's nothing wrong with me, there's something wrong with YOU for placing the life of some sick freak above the lives of men who have died for their country.

All comments are welcomed; imbeciles will be pointed to and laughed at.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Is A Second Spendulus On The Way? Joe "Can't Shut Up" Biden Says They "Misread" The Economy

To preface, let's start with some statistics on how well this Democratic payback plan, i.e. the spendulus bill, has been benefiting average Americans.

  • Projected to amount to nearly $10 Trillion worth of debt in the next ten years; an amount that even the healthiest economy would take generations to pay back.
  • We're broke.
  • Unemployment is at a 26 year high, hovering at 9.5% with double-digits not in the too distant future.
  • Almost 3 million more jobs have been lost than expected. People's unemployment is soon going to run out.
  • We're broke.
  • Wall Street just hit a 10-week low.
  • Outrageous spending bills introduced, most notably Cap & Trade. Let's not forget about National Healthcare.
  • We're broke.

However, as per the usual, the Democrats still are not satisfied. Outside Obama adviser Laura Tyson has actually proposed a second stimulus that is aimed at the economy. Apparently, by her own admittance, this one was not. The current $787 billion Democratic spendulus and payback bill was apparently "too small"; I guess the campaign donors are more like loan sharks than supporters. I heard Hollywood isn't such a cheap group, either.

According to Tyson, the US will not inflate away it's debt and the trustworthy Federal Reserve Board will "not allow it". Tyson also claims that the US, a country whose administration can not find or create jobs for anyone that doesn't line their pockets directly, can "afford" a second spendulus. Either she's living in the Twilight Zone or some pretty incredible medical marijuana was earmarked for the district she lives in.

Vice President Joseph "I Can't Believe They Haven't Sedated Me Into A Coma Yet" Biden, in a recent interview with George Step-on-all-of-us of ABC, claims that the administration has "misread" the economy. I'm not exactly sure how one can "misread" something that wasn't even read in the first place - i.e. the stimulus bill. Biden has also mentioned that the idea of a second stimulus is not too far-fetched, relinquishing on the statement that China isn't exactly looking forward to lending us billions more dollars that they most likely won't see a penny of until some time in the 3rd millennium.

Where do we get the money? Where the hell are we going to get the money to payback the money we already borrowed? Obama is treating America and China as his own personal piggy bank, and the hole just keeps getting deeper.

Time to start looking for caves in the woods.

Is A Second Spendulus On The Way? Joe "Can't Shut Up" Biden Says They

Monday, July 6, 2009

The Greatest Story (Lie) Ever Told - Global Warming And Why Obama's Plan Will Affect You

While most of you are still worried about some drugged up kiddy fiddler dying, the Democrats are getting away with one of the greatest crimes in America's history; Cap and Trade.

Sure, I've written about it before, but I don't think you realize the extent of what's going on here.

For years, the pseudoscientists in your very own government have had you under the impression that the planet is heating up - killing penguins, polar bears, Antarctic flies, fleas, Michael Jackson, etc. Despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, these same "scientists" refuse to accept or even listen to any sort of dissenting opinion. Some transparency, eh?

That's just the start of it. Every single life form that we know of requires CO2 to live, and man happens to contribute very little to excess CO2 in the atmosphere. Cow's and other barnyard animals farting contributes more to excess CO2 than any other. Do we place a tax on pigs and cows? Look it up; don't think it won't happen.

Obama wants you to think that he cares about the environment and "pollution" and is only taxing those responsible. Little do most people realize - everyone responsible means almost every citizen of the United States. Remember that little ole campaign promise that he wouldn't raise taxes on middle-income Americans? Well, that's double-speak as usual; he just plans on taxing eevrything those people own and buy.

For starters, EVERYONE'S energy bills will increase. Not much is known whether or not middle or low income earners will be given a break, you probably will as long as you're not a straight white conservative. Some sources claim as little as a few dollars; others claim that your bill could increase three-fold. Think that's all? What about all the industries that rely on, well...energy? You know - all of 'em. Look forward to almost everything that you buy, from fresh produce to manufactured products, to increase.

The newest Democratic plan is to "Track The World's Wealthiest": http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-GreenBusiness/idUSTRE56562Y20090706

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - To fairly divide the climate change fight between rich and poor, a new study suggests basing targets for emission cuts on the number of wealthy people, who are also the biggest greenhouse gas emitters, in a country.

Since about half the planet's climate-warming emissions come from less than a billion of its people, it makes sense to follow these rich folks when setting national targets to cut carbon dioxide emissions, the authors wrote on Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rich people, you mean those pesky taxpayers? You mean the top 10% of the population that accounts for almost 95% of the taxes? Those greedy businessmen that employ the majority of the country's workforce? Shame on those dedicated schmucks who prove themselves by working from the bottom up! And don't even think about entrepeneuralism, my friend; we don't need any more jobs or capital!

What I find funny is how will this affect our very favorite dictators, eh? Too bad it might cost your Senator a few extra bucks for his limo to cruise down Main St. for a hooker. Nancy Pelosi is S.O.L., I wonder if she plans on canceling all her future flights on Air Force 1; the jet she DEMANDS to take on a whim for any outing she pleases? I wonder what Michelle's carbon footprint is after she went on a tour of Paris, or when the Obamas decide to go on some private outing instead of actually, you know, doing stuff in the White House.

This is one interesting path we're going down, friends. In the meantime, I'll be looking for ways to colonize Mercury.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Top Ways To Lose Conservative Friends: #1 View Sarah Palin In An Objective Manner

Holy Moly.

My friends, I have come to the conclusion that Sarah Palin : Republicans as Barack Hussein Obama : Democrats. Both are sacred cows that can come under no scrutiny from that individual's party without said person being accused of sexism or racism. It's almost surreal and I wish that people would become a little more objective towards the politicians they admire.

Lately, one of the biggest news stories has been Palin stepping down from her gubernatorial position. Obviously, this has caused tons of controversy and conversation; both on the left and the right. Being an objective person and never really understanding the laudatory admiration and almost celebrity status that Palin holds among many conservatives, I decided I'd pose this question to both personal friends and on the internet. I began to realize something VERY quickly...

Do NOT criticize Sarah Palin!!! Don't ask questions, don't hold an objective viewpoint; do nothing but laud her obsequiously!

To put it lightly, I was quite a bit surprised. Now, the people I normally discuss politics with are fairly savvy and open-minded; except when it came to Sarah Palin. The response from women was most shocking and reminiscent of none other than criticizing Obama among Obamabots. Many times, I was called a sexist and that I am "afraid" of an "intelligent woman". Not only could they be further from the truth in accusing me of sexism, they couldn't cite one example of what made Mrs. Palin so remarkably intelligent, much less a good instance of why me or anyone else should be "afraid" of her.

Aside from that, tons of speculatory comments were thrown out in regards to why she really quit office. Some say she quit because of being absolutely brutalized in the media and plans on gettin out of politics for good, while others say she's going to start brushing up on social issues and foreign policy in order to make a run for the presidency in 2012. The last one scares me, but don't let any of your conservative friends know that. I think we need to face facts as we know them right now - Sarah Palin running in 2012 means Barack Obama until 2016.

Now, I know we all like to think that Sarah Palin was the best thing that John McCain did during the campaign, which isn't saying a lot. Au contraire, my friend; Sarah Palin lost McCain the female vote and probably cost him the entire election. Nearly 60% of women ended up voting for Obama, and his support actually INCREASED when Sarah Palin became part of McCain's already weak campaign. What makes you think the outcome will be much different if Sarah Palin decides to run against Obama in 2012?

Don't get me wrong, I think Sarah Palin may indeed be a good person that means well. She was completely lambasted in the media; worse than I've seen done to ANY politician, not even Bush. But, well, that's what they do. That's what the media does. We all know which way the media leans; any conservative that comes along is going to get a thorough beating while they let Obama pass another bill under the door with no opposition. No, she didn't deserve it, but that's what happens. I do feel sorry for her, but that doesn't make me blindly support her as it does so many other conservatives I know.

Folks, all I ask is that you don't do EXACTLY what you accuse your liberal opponents of doing and view things just a little more critically. Don't be fooled by someone you support just because they're your same gender or they're the opposite gender and you find them attractive. Don't blindly support someone just because they like guns and hunt moose in the Alaskan wilderness. Don't be fooled by someone that governs a fringe state that's much different than the continental US. Don't only support her because you feel sorry for her and think she gives good speeches.

For me, she leaves entirely too many questions open and hardly any answers. In my opinion, she was probably chosen as a minority candidate to be run up a flag poll and to offset both McCain's age and centrist, if not moderately leftist ideology. That's how she appears to me, but I know darned well that ain't a popular opinion.

I want to know if I'm totally off-base here. I want to know from YOU why I should love Sarah Palin. I don't hate her at all; just don't laud her, either. Am I wrong? Please comment!

Saturday, July 4, 2009

WE Decide What's Fair And Balanced!

First, it was Fox News's Major Garrett with his ballsy, "What took you so long?" comment aimed at Obama in reference to his hesitation on addressing the situation in Iran. The worst part? Our very favorite SoS Hillary Clinton practically begged Obama to address it in the first place; credit given where credit is due. All of a sudden Dear Leader is "shocked and appalled" at the violence in Iran, yet was quick to jump on the Communist bandwagon with brothers Chavez and Castro when it came to Argentina.

Now, we have far, far leftist Helen Thomas of the Hearst Corporation and Chip Reid of ABC News grilling the unbearably boring and speech-impaired Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on the "heavily controlled" media. Gee, ya think? Media control is nothing new, and it doesn't take rocket science to figure out it leans to the far left. What I do wonder, however, is if this instance of "lashing out" is not a form of media control in and of itself.

Has anyone here ever heard of democracy? You know; freedom of speech, Constitutionalism, freedom of choice, people's votes matter, etc. Obsolete stuff, I know. An issue has been brought up about this by a colleague of mine about whether this wasn't set up by our very own administration in order to fool the people into believing there was still freedom of speech in the media. We all know how far left Helen Thomas leans; who would've thought this woman would have said such a thing?

Put on your tinfoil hats, folks, but you have to wonder what's going on here. Since when have you heard of any sort of real dissent being nationally televised, and better yet, broadcasted for everyone to see? At first, I was both shocked and elated to see this little old woman make such a big splash. However, after my colleague's comment and upon re-examination of the video, I think he makes a very good point.

Since when are we to trust anything the mainstream media shoves down our throats? Are we all falling victim to a classic case of confirmation bias, and since it falls into line with our own ideology; we believe it? That's up to you. I urge you to think out the box on this one, you may find yourself thinking twice...

Friday, July 3, 2009

On Life, Liberty and Independence

"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one" - Benjamin Franklin

I will start this by saying; no matter what becomes of this country, no matter how far down the road of Communism we may go, no matter what freedom is stripped from us daily, this country shall receive my unconditional love. Unrequited as it may be, that love and passion will never wane as long as I live. This isn't over yet; not by a long shot. This great nation may very well be one of the last bastions of quasi-freedom on this Earth not completely dominated by tyrannical government and a complete absence of civil rights.

My ancestors came to this country as legal immigrants from Northern Europe; peasants in the grand scheme of things, seeking better opportunity. This country was built on the backs of those in pursuit of freedom; yet is now being destroyed by their very offspring. Nonetheless, my ancestors rose to a level they never would have in their own home countries; a feat not possible had it not been for our forefathers and their children who died in our wars in the name of liberty. It's called the American Dream for a reason, as these freedoms are not granted to us by oppressors; only by the oppressed who have chosen to fight for it.

It's my honor to be with you today and still have the right to throw my words in the face of the very people who seek to set fire to our Constitution and Bill of Rights. To still sit here and have the inalienable right to sort-of free speech keeps the embers of liberty burning within me; it'll take one hell of a tyrannical wave to snuff them out. That, my friends, is why I refuse to observe our day of independence any differently than before. To give up is to spit in the faces of the great men before me and concede my rights as an American.

If tomorrow the wall comes down, if tomorrow all freedom is shot; people in the same vein as you and I shall come together and bandage it's wound. When the final fabric holding together our country is ripped, we will stitch it together again. A nation is only as great as it's people, and the moment they give up the lifeblood of nationality is the second they begin to live as slaves. It is you and I who would rather starve and die free than live to become fat subjugates or corporate servants. It is for that reason, that as long as we have freedom in our hearts and in our blood; forever we shall remain.

Hopefully, I've instilled a bit of second-thought to those of you who have lost hope. As long as this great country doesn't change it's name, we live and die as Americans. Today, we celebrate our day of Independence, yet so much more than that. We celebrate the very values that so many before us conceived through nationalism, blood, sweat and tears. No Marxist administration and no freedom-haters will stop me from believing in and loving my country and my people.

Freedom bless you all - Happy Independence Day.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter